Saturday, March 19, 2011

First it was Saddam. Then Gaddafi. Now there's a vacancy for the West's favourite crackpot tyrant...


So we are going to take "all necessary measures" to protect the civilians of Libya, are we? Pity we didn't think of that 42 years ago. Or 41 years ago. Or... well, you know the rest. And let's not be fooled by what the UN resolution really means. Yet again, it's going to be regime-change. And just as in Iraq – to use one of Tom Friedman's only memorable phrases of the time – when the latest dictator goes, who knows what kind of bats will come flying out of the box?

And after Tunisia, after Egypt, it's got to be Libya, hasn't it? The Arabs of North Africa are demanding freedom, democracy, liberation from oppression. Yes, that's what they have in common. But what these nations also have in common is that it was us, the West, that nurtured their dictatorships decade after decade after decade. The French cuddled up to Ben Ali, the Americans stroked Mubarak, while the Italians groomed Gaddafi until our own glorious leader went to resurrect him from the political dead.

Could this be, I wonder, why we have not heard from Lord Blair of Isfahan recently? Surely he should be up there, clapping his hands with glee at another humanitarian intervention. Perhaps he is just resting between parts. Or maybe, like the dragons in Spenser's Faerie Queen, he is quietly vomiting forth Catholic tracts with all the enthusiasm of a Gaddafi in full flow. More...

Don't miss:
  1. Why is US backing force in Libya but not Bahrain, Yemen?
  2. Morally indignant sharks circle Libya...
  3. To the people of the Middle East: Fight for freedom, not democracy...
  4. Lew Rockwell on the USA's captive nations...
  5. Berlusconi 'sent escorts to Gaddafi opponent as favour to Libya leader'
  6. Forget Gaddafi. Blair's NEW best friend is a despot guilty of even bloodier slaughter... 

No comments:

Post a Comment